CAN Lawyers: Stand Up to Pro-terrorism Judges & Judicial Oligarchs

Letter of Masood Masjoody regarding Pro-terrorism malpractices of the BC Court of Appeal and the abusive judicial oligarchy of “Hunter Litigation Chambers” in the province of British Columbia

Letter of August 8, 2023

Dear Sir/Madam:

Subject:

(1) Pro-terrorism malpractices of the BC Court of Appeal reflected in the egregiously deceitful and dishonest conduct of three judges: Peter G. Voith, Lauri Ann Fenlon, and Mary V. Newbury; and

(2) Abusive judicial oligarchy of Hunter Litigation Chambers in Vancouver

You are receiving this letter because you are either (1) a lawyer practicing in the province of British Columbia and are directly affected by the irreparable damage to the integrity of the BC courts caused by the unprecedented judicial misconduct of the named judges, or (2) a lawyer practicing anywhere in Canada and could soon be affected by the named judges’ undermining the integrity of the Canadian justice system and by the prospect of the expansion of the sheerly embarrassing situation in a BC superior court to your province of practice if the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) fails to properly address and resolve the situation.

By this letter, I invite you to file your own complaint to the CJC against the named judges thereby seeking to restore some of the lost integrity of the justice system.

This letter is to provide you with the necessary information regarding the named judges’ misconduct between March 14 and May 30, 2023, which misconduct was deliberately devised to block access to justice to the end of covering up the international terrorists (including a ballistic missile expert and affiliates of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) and their enablers in Canadian academia.

The judges’ misconduct has been detailed in my complaint CJC 23-0233 and supplementary documents (in two sets submitted July 4, 26, 2023), found at:

https://tinyurl.com/CJC-23-0233 and https://tinyurl.com/CJC-23-0233-suppl

whereby I asked CJC for the removal of the judges from office for serious misconduct, including lack of diligence, lying, hoaxing the public in a matter of high public interest, lack of integrity, lack of impartiality, obstruction of justice, conspiracy, and conducting themselves in a way that embarrasses the Canadian justice system.

Two Vancouver-based law firms Farris and Hunter Litigation Chambers have been involved in the pro-terrorism conduct of the courts by obstructing justice and giving effect to the extrajudicial political and financial influence of terrorists and terrorists’ enablers.

SFU lawyer Claire **Hunter** and Judges John **Hunter** and Peter G. **Voith** are from ***Hunter Litigation Chambers***;
Bottom: Judges **Fenlon** and **Newbury** of the BC Court of Appeal

Background and further detail

Before the court on appeal was a judgment of the BC Supreme Court’s Shelley Fitzpatrick who on one hand had declined jurisdiction to hear and determine the merits of my claim against enablers of terrorists within Simon Fraser University (SFU) and on the other hand had viciously and inhumanely attacked me for daring to raise allegations against her biasedly favourite side. In a period of two years, the Court of Appeal conveniently, continuously and utterly shamelessly, decided to ignore the bias of Fitzpatrick, which I had expressly raised, and in doing so the court officers trampled the core values of the justice system and professional, as well as basic, ethics, up and ultimately to the level of lying in the face of the documents authored by the courts and using absolute lies to the end of obstructing justice.

Terrorism supporters, sexual harassers, and defamers such as Marni Mishna (associate dean of DIE) and Mary-Catherine Kropinski (associate dean of DIE, vice president’s special advisor of DIE)-who were also criminally involved in bribery and coercion for obstruction of justice- have been strategically placed in D.I.E. leadership positions at SFU. SFU’s bribery involved a citizen of France, Amélie Trotignon, whose matter and hostage-taking by a Canadian public body was brought to the attention of President Emmanuel Macron and Université de Tours in France.

The legal action I commenced in the lower court arose from a widespread revengeful conspiracy of SFU by way of sexual harassment and defamation in response to a report of mine about the presence and activities of terrorist agents at SFU. SFU then strategically placed in D.I.E.-related leadership positions (D.I.E. standing for the so-called notion of Diversity, Inclusion, Equity) some of the main executors of its conspiracy against me, including Marni Julie Mishna and Mary-Catherine Kropinski, who have been involved in supporting the terrorist regime of the Islamic Republic and were at the forefront of SFU’s vengeful conspiracy through sexually harassing and concurrently defaming me. SFU also conspired with the cult of Nizari Ismailis by having published further defamatory content on the Internet right after the publication of Fitzpatrick’s judgment, thereby trying to portray as victims such sexual harassers and defamers as Mishna and Kropinski, alongside the SFU management.

This obstruction of justice scheme, which was ultimately carried out by the named judges in favour of terrorists and their enablers, was initiated and encouraged by

Simon Fraser University (SFU),
Hunter Litigation Chambers (co-founded by now judges of BC Court of Appeal Peter G. Voith and John Hunter) and SFU lawyer and John Hunter’s close relative Claire Hunter; and,
SFU lawyers from Farris law firm, namely, Robert B. Kennedy and Yun Li-Reilly (employed by the Court since 2016; see https://tinyurl.com/li-reilly and also https://tinyurl.com/rb-kennedy )

In one instance, SFU included its instructions for obstruction of justice in a filed application to the Court whereby calling on the judges to cancel the plaintiff on political grounds and because of the plaintiff’s opposition to the Radical Left’s agenda and agents of the terrorist regime of the Islamic Republic. Peter G. Voith, who is supposedly the author of the expressly dishonest judgment of May 30, 2023, is only one of the judges who resorted to absolute lies and other forms of serious judicial misconduct to the end of obstructing justice from the very position that is otherwise supposed to uphold justice and protect the rule of law. It was under SFU and others’ influence that Voith’s misconduct even extended to blatant lying in the face of the courts’ own documents, including but not limited to the published judgement of Fitzpatrick in Masjoody v. SFU.

Ironically, judges Voith and Hunter had prominent roles in the Law Society of BC and its Ethics Committee, as currently does the leading lawyer at Hunter Litigation Chambers and John Hunter’s close relative Claire Hunter. While pushing for extrajudicial influence favouring Islamic terrorists, Hunter Litigation Chambers has benefited from several grants for its pretentious work on (not against but possibly for) money laundering activities, which activities comprise a source of foreign influence particularly by state Islamic terrorists acting in Canada on behalf of the Islamic Republic regime in Iran.

In these overall circumstances, it is only fair and reasonable to consider Hunter Litigation Chambers as the nesting firm of a judicial oligarch (in and out of the BC courts and the Law Society) and a major source of judicial corruption in the province including, among other things, covering up international terrorists through the “judicial service” of its founders.

It is worth mentioning once more that SFU has had a proven ability in buying influence in the courts of BC and in making certain judges and other court officials undermine the rule of law, obstruct justice, or double down on aspects of SFU’s actions related to its support for a terrorist regime and SFU’s conspiracy against the whistleblowing plaintiff. It is likely that SFU’s corrupt influence could extend from the courts to the CJC if a screening officer there feels free of proper public and professional scrutiny.

You are therefore encouraged to review the matter and file your complaint, or simply second the terms of the existing complaint, to defend the integrity of your profession and to weaken any prospective CJC’s inclination to send the matter conveniently under the rug and cover up the thuggish conduct of the judges Voith, Fenlon, and Newbury of the BC Court of Appeal.

Respectfully,

Masood Masjoody, Ph.D.

August 8, 2023

اوباش قضایی پشتیبان رژیم تروریستی اسلامی در کانادا

هشدار به هیأت قضایی کانادا نسبت به لاپوشانی تخلفات محرز سه قاضی از ونکوور- نامه بیست و ششم ژوییه 2023

خلاصه: اعتراض به لاپوشانی حضور و نفوذ عوامل رژیم تروریستی اسلامی در مراکز تحقیقاتی و دولتی کانادا و زیرپا گذاشتن پایه‌ای ترین اصول جهان‌شمول قضایی از سوی قضات برای حمایت از جاسوسان نظامی و سیاسی رژیم، به اعتصاب غذایی انجامید که از 21 فوریه تا 27 ژوئن ادامه یافت. تحولی مهم در میانه این اعتراض، این بود که در 30 مه، تخلفات اوباش قضایی به اوج رسوایی خود رسید و با دروغ‌گویی آشکار و گسترده در حکمی شرم‌آور، مبنی بر ادامه لاپوشانی برای تروریست های اسلامی-سپاهی، بروز یافت. این نوشتار، به شکایت از سه قاضی متخلف نزد”هیأت قضایی کانادا” مربوط است که در پست های پیشین، به متن اولیه و تکمیلی نخست آن و نیز اطلاع‌رسانی پیرامون آن به اعضای پارلمان کانادا (در هر دو مجلس عوام و سنا) ، دادستان کل استان بریتیش کلمبیا و اعضای پارلمان استانی بریتیش کلمبیا پرداخته ام. این نوشتار مروری بر جریان شکایت از سه قاضی از آغاز تا ثبت متن تکمیلی دوم شکایت خواهد داشت. اکنون، پیروزی ما در هیأت قضایی کانادا، به فروپاشی بخشی مهم از حلقه هواداران رژیم در دادگاه ها و دولت کانادا خواهد انجامید و از جمله مقاومت دولت ترودو در برابر شناسایی« سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی » به عنوان سازمانی تروریستی را به مرز فروپاشی خواهد رساند

یکم. شکایت من از سه قاضی که -ظاهرا بدون آنکه زحمت خواندن شکایت را به خود بدهند- تصمیم گرفتند با دروغ‌پردازی و وارونه‌سازی رسوای حقایق بهانه برای بستن پرونده و رهانیدن جاسوسان و همکاران رژیم تروریستی اسلامی جور کنند، در روز شانزدهم ژونن 2023 در «هیأت قضایی کانادا» به ثبت رسید

دوم. پس از ثبت شکایت از قضات، در 25 ژوئن 2023، تمامی اعضای پارلمان فدرال (در هر دو مجلس) را با ایمیل‌هایی جداگانه، از چگونگی تخلفات قضات، گستردگی آن، و رسوایی ناشی از حمایت دادگاه از تروریست‌های اسلامی آگاه کردم

سوم. در 27 ژوئن، در نامه‌ای از قضات متخلف خواستم که تنها یکی از چندین دروغی که در متن حکمشان گنجانده بودند را تصحیح کنند. این سه قاضی، مدعی شده بودند که قاضی دادگاه اولیه به دنبال بستن شکایت من، حکم داده است که شاکی، مخارج پرونده را به همکاران رژیم در دانشگاه سایمن‌فریزر بپردازد؛ حال آنکه حکم دادگاه بدوی آشکارا حاوی نقیض این گزاره است. جزئیات مربوط را در متن نامه به قضات خواهید یافت. در نامه 27 ژوئن، همچنین قضات را از ثبت شکایت و نامه‌نگاری پیرو آن به پارلمان آگاه کردم

چهارم. در روز 4 ژوییه 2023، ارسال نامه 27 ژوئن را، به عنوان مشتی نمونه خروار از بی‌اعتنایی مطلق قضات متخلف حتی نسبت به ساده ترین موضاعات موجود در مدارک تولیدشده از سوی خود دستگاه قضایی (که از سوی دادگاه منتشر شده است و در دسترس همگان است)، به هیأت قضایی کانادا گزارش دادم و اعلام کردم که می‌خواهم هر گونه پاسخ قضات و یا طفره رفتن آنها از پاسخدهی به نامه 27 ژوئن نیز در بررسی تخلفات قضات در نظر گرفته شود؛ چرا که می‌تواند نشان‌دهنده درجه رذالت و حقیقت‌پوشی قضات متخلف در حمایت از تروریستها به هر بهایی باشد

پنجم. هیأت قضایی کانادا، به طور معمول شکایت از قضات را غربال‌گری می‌کند و بسیاری از شکایت‌ها را بی هیچ‌گونه بررسی رد می‌کند. با این همه، دخالت دادستان‌های کل استانی در پرونده تخلف یک قاضی، مشمول گام غربال‌گری نمی‌شود. به این معنی که در مواردی که تخلف یک قاضی به حیثیت دستگاه قضایی لطمه زده است و تخلف به اندازه‌ای جدی‌ست که برکناری قاضی می‌تواند مورد نظر قرار بگیرد، دادستان کل استان می‌تواند هیأت قضایی را وادار کند که درباره تخلف دست به تحقیق و بررسی بزند. در این حالت، راه سو استفاده از گام غربال‌گری برای لاپوشانی تخلف قضات بسته می‌شود. این موضوع در بند 63.1 قانون قضات (مبنای شکایت 16 ژوئن)آمده است

هیأت قضایی کانادا موظف به آغاز حقیقت‌یابی درباره تخلف یک قاضی است، چنان‌چه دادستان کل/وزیر دادگستری استان خواهان بررسی شده باشد که آیا قاضی باید به یکی از دلایل مندرج در بند 65-2 برکنار شود یا خیر
برگردان بند 63.1 قانون قضات در کانادا

Inquiries concerning Judges Inquiries

63 (1) The Council shall, at the request of the Minister or the attorney general of a province, commence an inquiry as to whether a judge of a superior court should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(a) to (d).
Judges Act, RSC 1985, c J-1

ششم. در روز 19 ژوئن، نامه‌ای به دادستان کل استان بریتیش‌کلمبیا، “نیکی شارما”ی هندی‌تبار، فرستاده شد که از او می‌خواست به پاسداشت حاکمیت قانون و عدالت، و برای برگرداندن حیثیت ار دست رفته دادگاه‌ها از هیأت قضایی کانادا بخواهد که حقیقت‌یابی درباره تخلفات سه قاضی دادگاه تجدیدنظر را آغاز کند. دو روز بعد، نامه‌های مشابهی به یکایک اعضای پارلمان بریتیش‌کلمبیا فرستاده شد که از ایشان می‌خواست بر پاسخ دادستان کل به نامه 19 ژوئن نظارت کنند

هر گونه واکنش و یا سکوت دادستان «نیکی شارما» در این‌باره، در محدوده اختیارات نظارتی اعضای مجلس قانون‌گذاری است و از جمله می‌تواند مبنای پرسش‌گری اعضای مجلس از دادستان کل باشد

Any action, or lack thereof, by the دادHonourable Niki Sharma in this matter will be subject to the oversight of the Legislative Assembly, including questioning the Attorney General of BC by the Members of the Legislative Assembly.
Letter of 21 July 2023 to all Members of BC Legislative Assembly

هفتم. در 26 ژوئیه، نامه‌های 19 و 21 ژوئیه در دومین دسته از استدلال‌ها و مدارک تکمیلی گنجانده شد و در اختیار هیأت قضایی کانادا قرار گرفت

voith-july26-ed Download

BC Parliament and inquiry RE: Terrorism-Backing Judges

Letter of Masood Masjoody: Parliament must intervene to bring back the court’s integrity

In a letter of 21 July 2023, all Members of the Legislative Assembly of BC were informed about the overwhelmingly egregious misconduct of three judges of the BC Court of Appeal, Peter G. Voith, Lauri Ann Fenlon, and Mary V. Newbury, who criminally obstructed justice to purposefully cover up for and favour the agents and enablers of the terrorist regime of the Islamic Republic ruling Iran, particularly the regime’s enablers within public and governmental bodies in Canada.

The letter informs the MLAs of an earlier request made to Attorney General Niki Sharma two days earlier. It reminds the MLAs that the judicial misconduct of the judges is not immune from the legislative and executive branches’ scrutiny, as per sec 63(1) of the Judges Act, whose constitutionality has been confirmed by the Federal Court of Appeal.

Inquiries concerning Judges Inquiries

63 (1) The Council shall, at the request of the Minister or the attorney general of a province, commence an inquiry as to whether a judge of a superior court should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(a) to (d).
Judges Act, RSC 1985, c J-1

The letter to the MLAs contains in the attachment the 263-page request to Attorney General Niki Sharma and points out that:

Any action, or lack thereof, by the Honourable Niki Sharma in this matter will be subject to the oversight of the Legislative Assembly, including questioning the Attorney General of BC by the Members of the Legislative Assembly.
Letter of 21 July 2023 to all Members of BC Legislative Assembly

The letter reads:

Subject: An overwhelming obstruction of justice scheme in and by the BC Court of Appeal in support of foreign terrorist agents and enablers, reported to Hon. Attorney General on July 19, 2023

I am writing to bring to your attention the serious misconduct of three BC Court of Appeal judges amounting to obstruction of justice and undermining the rule of law and the integrity of the justice system in British Columbia. The judges’ misconduct was purposefully aimed at favouring foreign terrorists and their enablers within BC public bodies, particularly at Simon Fraser University, whose administration has harboured a ballistic missiles expert and several other agents from the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (the “IRGC”).

On July 19, 2023, I asked Attorney General to compel the Canadian Judicial Council (“CJC”) to commence an inquiry into the conduct of three judges of the court, namely,

Peter G. Voith

Mary V. Newbury; and

Lauri Ann Fenlon.

These judges’ misconduct includes, among other things, resorting to absolute lies, lack of diligence in performing basic judicial duties, and conspiracy among judges to obstruct justice, with the ultimate outcome of protecting a terrorist regime’s agents and their powerful enablers within the public and governmental bodies in Canada. The judges’ misconduct was enumerated under 13 distinct components the establishment of each of which should warrant their removal from office.

My request to the Attorney General has been made pursuant to S. 63(1) of the Judges Act (where the Canadian Judicial Council is referred to as “Council”):

Inquiries concerning Judges Inquiries

63 (1) The Council shall, at the request of the Minister or the attorney general of a province, commence an inquiry as to whether a judge of a superior court should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(a) to (d).

Judges Act, RSC 1985, c J-1

As such, any action, or lack thereof, by the Honourable Niki Sharma in this matter will be subject to the oversight of the Legislative Assembly, including questioning the Attorney General of BC by the Members of the Legislative Assembly.

I should point out that there is absolutely no inconsistency between the principle of judicial independence and the right of the Legislative Assembly and the Minister of Attorney General to intervene when there seems to be an instance of judicial misconduct that could warrant the removal of a judge from office. Indeed, when the constitutionality S. 63(1) of the Judges Act was challenged, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that:

Judicial independence does not require that the conduct of judges be immune from scrutiny by the legislative and executive branches of government. On the contrary, an appropriate regime for the review of judicial conduct is essential to maintain public confidence in the judiciary. […] The guarantee of judicial tenure free from improper interference is essential to judicial independence. But it is equally important to remember that protections for judicial tenure were “not created for the benefit of the judges, but for the benefit of the judged. […] The public interest in an appropriate procedure for the review of the conduct of judges is an aspect of the public interest in the administration of justice. Therefore, it seems to me to be consistent with Canadian constitutional principles for provincial attorneys general to play a part in the review of the conduct of judges of the superior courts of their respective provinces. […] I conclude that subsection 63(1) of the Judges Act is constitutional.

Federal Court of Appeal
Cosgrove v. Canadian Judicial Council, 2007 FCA 103

Please find attached the letter and supporting documents sent on July 19, 2023, to Hon. Niki Sharma, and do not hesitate if you have any questions.

Many thanks in advance for your expected consideration of this matter of high public interest and national and international security against state-sponsored terrorism.

Yours sincerely,

Masood Masjoody, Ph.D.

July 21, 2023

Letter of 19 July 2023 to Attorney General Niki Sharma

Is AG of BC Against or For Terrorism-Backing Judges?

Letter of Masood Masjoody to Attorney General Niki Sharma:

AG Must compel the Canadian Judicial Council to initiate an inquiry for the potential removal of corrupted Judges:

Peter G. Voith

Lauri Ann Fenlon

Mary V. Newbury

Subject:

request to compel the Canadian Judicial Council to commence an inquiry into the conduct of Court of Appeal judges against the rule of law and integrity of the justice system and in favour of foreign terrorist agents and their enablers

In the matter of Masjoody v. Simon Fraser University, CA 48922
subject line of the letter of July 19 to AG Sharma

Today, a 263-page letter was sent to Attorney General Niki Sharma of the Province of British Columbia suggesting that the AG should compel the Canadian Judicial Council to commence an inquiry into the misconduct of three judges of the BC Court of Appeal who were involved in an obstruction of justice scheme favouring the agents and enablers of the terrorist Islamic Regime in Iran in Canadian public bodies and government.

The request for the AG’s intervention was made pursuant to section 63(1) of the Judges Act:

Inquiries concerning Judges Inquiries

63 (1) The Council shall, at the request of the Minister or the attorney general of a province, commence an inquiry as to whether a judge of a superior court should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(a) to (d).
Judges Act, RSC 1985, c J-1

The letter reads:

The Honourable Niki Sharma

Attorney General of British Columbia

I hope this letter finds you well.

I am writing to request that, under section 63(1) of the Judges Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. J-1, the Honourable Attorney General compel the Canadian Judicial Council (“CJC”) to commence an inquiry into the highly disturbing judicial misconduct of three judges of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (referred herein to as the “respondent judges”), which misconduct has amounted- among other things- to resorting to absolute lies, lack of diligence in performing basic judicial duties, and conspiracy among judges to obstruct justice, with the ultimate outcome of protecting a terrorist regime’s agents and their powerful enablers within the public and governmental bodies in Canada.

The respondent judges are:

Peter G. Voith

Mary V. Newbury; and

Lauri Ann Fenlon.

Whereas I have already filed a complaint against these judges,i.e, CJC File 23-0233, it is by no means unlikely for the obvious obstruction of justice in the BC courts to extend to some elements within the CJC thereby causing a potential baseless dismissal of the complaint by a low-ranked CJC employee in the screening phase absent of due consideration of the undisputable evidence put before the CJC.

Any reasonable fair and informed person will recognize on reviewing the complaint and supporting evidence that there has been a very stubborn resistance in this matter by the BC court officers against the rule of law and principles of fairness and justice which resistance may not simply end at the courts’ level and could continue with some, possibly already installed, “insurance policy” in the CJC or any reviewing forum.

On the other hand, given the unique role of the Attorney General in protecting the rule of law in the province, which rule has been egregiously trampled as a result of the respondent judges’ misconduct, the intervention of the Attorney General is not only appropriate but also a necessary step toward mending the damages caused to the integrity of the courts and public’s trust in the justice system in British Columbia.

Moreover and of particular interest is that the intervention of the Attorney General will eliminate an otherwise convenient, however baseless, dismissal of the complaint in the screening phase in the CJC, which phase, as explained above, is prone to be abused to delay, or even block, a much-deserved urgent inquiry into the conduct of the respondent judges.

For maximum clarity, this request is made under section 63(1) of the Judges Act, copied below:

Inquiries concerning Judges Inquiries

63 (1) The Council shall, at the request of the Minister or the attorney general of a province, commence an inquiry as to whether a judge of a superior court should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(a) to (d).

Judges Act, RSC 1985, c J-1

The types of misconduct enumerated in CJC Complaint 23-0233 are captured by at least three, and arguably all four, of the reasons outlined in paragraphs 65(2)(2) to (d) in the Act, and include:

lack of diligence in performing general judicial duties;

absolute lack of diligence in reading the text of the judgment under the appeal;

resorting to absolute lies about the text of the judgment under the appeal in a way that embarrasses the justice system and undermines its integrity in the eyes of any reasonable and fair informed person;

lack of any attempt to read the documents filed with the court (thereby missing out on all basic facts of the appeal);

resorting to bald-faced lies and fabrications in the absence of any discernible diligence in learning the basics of the case through reading the materials filed with the Court;

pretending their fabricated statements made in the absence of any genuine fact-finding, to constitute the facts of the case;

lack of diligence by evading a proper response to multiple requests from the appellant for clarification and specification of the issues supposedly before the division;

multiple failures in providing the appellant with an opportunity for a fair hearing;

hoaxing the public through lies and deceptive conduct in a matter of high public interest;

engaging in overall conduct prone to obstructing justice through conspiracy among the judges to cover up for a terrorist regime’s enablers and agents in Canadian soil;

lack of integrity;

lack of impartiality; and, overall,

conducting themselves in a way that embarrasses the Canadian justice system and fails it as the ultimate protector of democracy.

Attached to this letter are the original CJC complaint and evidence, filed on 16 June 2023, and the supplementary argument and evidence, filed on 4 July 2023.

It is expected that your request for an inquiry, which, as per the Judges Act, the CJC cannot evade, will hugely trouble the terrorists and their enablers in their collaboration with judicial thugs and charlatans who have shown zero care for ethics and the rule of law and whose presence in a superior court of the province is a mockery of justice and slap in the face of fairness and basic ethics.

I look forward to hearing about your concrete actions toward re-establishing integrity and ethics in the BC justice system through a request for the removal of judges Voith, Newbury, and Fenlon from the BC Court of Appeal.

Yours sincerely,

Masood Masjoody, Ph.D.

July 19, 2023

Enclosed:

Appendix 1: CJC Complaint 23-0233,           16 June 2023          (13 pgs, 4-16)

Appendix 2: Supporting evidence,           16 June 2023          (216 pgs, 17-232)

Appendix 3: Additional submissions,           4 July 2023           (31 pgs, 233-263)

Letter of 19 July 2023 to Attorney General Niki Sharma

Canadian Judiciary on the Scale of Justice

Updated (July 26, 2023):

A second set of supplementary evidence was provided to the CJC on July 26, 2023 concerning the CJC’s deafening silence about the matter and likely abuse of the screening process (officer: Jacqueline Corado) for sending the matter under the rug. This followed letters to BC Attorney General of BC and all BC Legislative Assembly members.

Complementary evidence (Set 1) against the terrorism-backing Judges:

Peter G. Voith

Lauri Ann Fenlon

Mary V. Newbury

Two days after the 25-June, 2023, letter to all Canadian MPs and Senators, an application was made to the three judges Voith, Fenlon, and Newbury seeking to have the text of their judgment amended for the correction of one of the egregiously false claims made by the judges in the face of the court’s own documents. This application of 27 June 2023, was copied to the Canadian Judicial Council, and to BC Chief Justice, Bauman.

On 4 July 2023, the CJC received this letter and the accompanying argument, as further supporting documentation in the matter of the complaint (CJC file 23-0233) against the judicial misconduct of these professional liars who have shamelessly obstructed justice from the bench and sold out the court’s integrity only to favour the terrorist regime of the Islamic Republic and its enablers in the Canadian government and academia alike.

The supplementary argument in the CJC Complaint 23-0233

25 June 2023

The Honourable [Name of Senator/MP],

Please see attached a letter of today’s date concerning the influence of the Islamic Republic’s regime leading to an obstruction of justice and reckless violations of justice and human rights by the BC Court of Appeal.

The specifics of the regime’s influence were brought to Minister Mendicino‘s attention in a letter of 11 April 2023, where I noted communications with the intelligence community back in 2021. It seems that the government has conveniently ignored all those communications despite the Minister’s office claiming a careful review of the communications.

The attached letter is addressed to all of the honourable Senators and MPs. It has as an appendix a complaint to the Canadian Judicial Council against the judicial misconduct of three judges Peter G. Voith, Lauri Ann Fenlon, and Mary V. Newbury, who deliberately and on the basis of their absolute lies kept the courts of law inaccessible to a victim of a terrorist regime’s agents and enablers in Canada and protected those agents and enablers on Canadian soil.

Yours sincerely,

Masood Masjoody, Ph.D.

e-mail to all members of the House of Commons and the Senate of Canada

The June-27 application to Voith, Fenlon and Newbury

This application was included in the supplementary documentation submitted to the CJC.

The Second set of Complementary Evidence, July 26, 2023

PDF file:

cjc26jul2023 Download

Letter to All Canada’s MPs and Senators

Terrorist IRGC Influencing Canadian Courts

Latest Obstruction of Justice by BC Court of Appeal judges:

Peter G. Voith

Lauri Ann Fenlon

Mary V. Newbury

On 25 June 2023, a letter was sent to all of the Canadian MPs and federal Senators, addressing the influence of the IRGC and the Islamic Republic regime on Canadian courts, and obstruction of justice by the contaminated courts in the province of British Columbia.

The letter was sent by separate e-mail attachment to the recipients.

The e-mail reads:

25 June 2023

The Honourable [Name of Senator/MP],

Please see attached a letter of today’s date concerning the influence of the Islamic Republic’s regime leading to an obstruction of justice and reckless violations of justice and human rights by the BC Court of Appeal.

The specifics of the regime’s influence were brought to Minister Mendicino‘s attention in a letter of 11 April 2023, where I noted communications with the intelligence community back in 2021. It seems that the government has conveniently ignored all those communications despite the Minister’s office claiming a careful review of the communications.

The attached letter is addressed to all of the honourable Senators and MPs. It has as an appendix a complaint to the Canadian Judicial Council against the judicial misconduct of three judges Peter G. Voith, Lauri Ann Fenlon, and Mary V. Newbury, who deliberately and on the basis of their absolute lies kept the courts of law inaccessible to a victim of a terrorist regime’s agents and enablers in Canada and protected those agents and enablers on Canadian soil.

Yours sincerely,

Masood Masjoody, Ph.D.

e-mail to all members of the House of Commons and the Senate of Canada

Letter to MPs and Senators

The letter contains as an appendix the CJC complaint against three BC Court of Appeal judges who resorted to absolute lies to protect Islamic terrorists and their enablers.

parliament25june2023 Download

IRGC-backing Judges in Canada

Complaint of June 2023 to the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC),

File#23-0233

against judicial misconduct of

Peter G. Voith

Lauri Ann Fenlon

Mary V. Newbury

The CJC complaint, filed on 16 June 2023, can be found here.

BC Courts protecting agents and enablers of an Islamic terrorist regime

Since 2020, dealing with my action Masjoody v. Simon Fraser University, the courts of British Columbia (Supreme Court and Court of Appeal) have persistently covered up for agents and enablers of the terrorist Mullahs regime in Iran among which agents is the ballistic missiles expert Shahrokh Jam. The regime’s agents enjoyed the full support of the management of Simon Fraser University (SFU), particularly the former and current presidents of SFU Andrew Petter and Joy Johnson.

See here for the agents of the regime supported by the SFU administration.

Shahrokh Jam, a ballistic missiles expert of the Islamic Republic of Iran, supported and protected by the SFU administration in Burnaby, BC

In the last series of BC Courts’ misconduct, three judges of the BC Court of Appeal decided to substitute blatant lies for the facts from the court’s own documents, only because their pre-determined outcome of the appeal is not supported by the contents of the court’s own documents. Consequently, the judges issued a baseless judgment to the end of keeping a case of interference of the Islamic Republic regime in Canada out of open courts thereby supporting the regime’s agents and their powerful enablers within the government and other public institutions in Canada.

whereas, according to the court’s filings and a previous judgment (which was under appeal),

AS A MATTER OF FACT, the judgment of a biased judge (Shelley Fitzpatrick) had been appealed,
AS A MATTER OF FACT, hers being biased had been raised, and
AS A MATTER OF FACT, that biased judge is seized of several matters listed in her judgment that was under appeal,

the three judges Voith, Fenlon and Newbury of the Court of Appeal presented as the basis for their decision the very opposites of all of these facts as the facts of the case and, based on their anti-facts, dismissed the appeal. They indeed dismissed the appeal without any hearing in open courts. The judges then persisted in defending their judgment on the basis of such obvious lies and refused to make corrections and re-open the appeal on the basis of TRUE facts supported by the courts’ own documents!

The judges’ misconduct has been addressed in a complaint filed with the Canadian Judicial Council on 16 June 2023.

Summary of the claim against SFU

Following my disclosure of SFU management’s political, scientific, and technical support for the terrorist regime of “the Islamic Republic of Iran” (the “Regime”) and three of the Regime’s agents connected with its ballistic missile and nuclear weapon programs, Iran’s dictator and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (“IRGC”), SFU commenced a revengeful conspiracy campaign against me aiming at diverting the issue of its connection with and support for the Regime.

SFU engaged several offices and individuals within the administration and directed them in a conspiracy to sexually harass and defame the whistleblower and subsequently cover up the criminalities. The co-conspirators include among others:

Paul Kench (former dean of SFU faculty of science, now working at the National University of Singapore);
Jennifer Harrington (then-staff member of SFU Human Resources)
Marry Catherine Kropinski (special advisor of SFU vice president of D.I.E., former D.I.E. associate dean of the SFU faculty of science, former chair of the Math Department)
Marni Julie Mishna (D.I.E. associate dean of SFU faculty of science, faculty member of the SFU math dept.)
Andrew Petter (then-president of SFU)
Susanne Stockdill (staff member of the dean of SFU faculty of science office)

At the forefront of advancing SFU’s conspiracy were Mishna and Kropinski, both of acted directly under Kench’s coordination and have occupied several positions related to the cultural Marxist notion of Diversity, Inclusion, Equity (D.I.E.).

Bias and judiocial misconduct of Shelley Fitzpatrick (of BCSC)

I commenced an action in the Supreme Court of BC (“BCSC”) seeking damages for revengful defamation and conspiracy. On August 3, 2021, a judge of the Supreme Court of British Columbia called Shelley Colleen Fitzpatrick (“Fitzpatrick”) decided to evade the hearing of the action on the merits and block the discovery process, by claiming a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. In the same decision, Fitzpatrick exhibited obvious signs of bias and— presumably, to please and entertain the wealthy and politically powerful SFU administration and their governmental supporters by her written judgment— inhumanly and pathetically expressed her disbelief in the allegations raised, mocked the pleadings, and verbally attacked me for daring to raise allegations against her favourite SFU administration in its connections with a terrorist regime.

While Fitzpatrick ruled in her judgment that it was not the issue before her to determine the merits of the allegations, on the very occasion that she aborted the discovery process as a necessary step for fact-finding, she pathetically called out the allegations against her favourite wealthy and politically powerful side as “escalated”, “bizarre”, and “irrational”. Fitzpatrick also decorated her judgement with fact manipulations, fabrications and many outright lies, all amounting to appeasing the Regime and its enablers.

Fitzpatrick then ordered on August 3, 2021, that she would be seized of any applications, including for costs and an injunction application, to be rescheduled in the matter.

See here and here for Fitzpatrick’s judicial misconduct and a complaint gainst her to the CJC.

On August 17, 2021, I appealed Fitzpatrick’s decision only 14 days after it was pronounced and in the subsequent factum, expressly addressed the bias of the judge and sought that the Court set aside the seizure of the matter by Fitzpatrick. However, these matters were not addressed by the Court as a result of which I ended up filing a fresh appeal focusing solely on these ignored issues.

The judicial misconduct of the three named judges of the BC Court of appeal has been addressded in the complaint of 16 June 2023 and includes the following:

lack of diligence in performing general judicial duties;
absolute lack of diligence in reading the text of the judgment under the appeal;
resorting to absolute lies about the text of the judgment under the appeal in a way that embarrasses the justice system and undermines its integrity in the eyes of any reasonable and fair informed person;
lack of any attempt to read the documents filed with the court (thereby missing out on all basic facts of the appeal);
resorting to bald-faced lies and fabrications in the absence of any discernible diligence in learning the basics of the case through reading the materials filed with the Court;
pretending their fabricated statements made in the absence of any genuine fact-finding, to constitute the facts of the case;
lack of diligence by evading a proper response to multiple requests from the appellant for clarification and specification of the issues supposedly before the division;
multiple failures in providing the appellant with an opportunity for a fair hearing;
hoaxing the public through lies and deceptive conduct in a matter of high public interest;
engaging in overall conduct prone to obstructing justice through conspiracy among the judges to cover up for a terrorist regime’s enablers and agents in Canadian soil;
lack of integrity;
lack of impartiality; and, overall,
conducting themselves in a way that embarrasses the Canadian justice system and fails it as the ultimate protector of democracy.

The complaint against Fenlon, Newbury, and Voith of BC Court of Appeal:

cjc_bcca_masjoody-16jun2023 Download

Cover

110 Days on Hunger Strike

against Canada’s favouritism for #IRGCterrorists in the government and courts

updated: June 10, 2023

See also: Letter to BC Court of Appeal; Seeking to Revive the Appeal Dismissed in a Textbook Kangaroo Court Style, 30 May 2023, O CANADA!

Parvaz TV report: published on June 9, 2023 (transcript: Persian / English )

English Transcript

For more than a hundred days I have kept my mouth from food so that my tongue remains open to reveal the truth and fight against oppression.

I am Massoud Masjoody, a political activist, mathematician and former university instructor.

I am determined to stand and fight until the end for the aspirations of millions of freedom-loving Iranians whether exiled- like myself- or imprisoned in the homeland under the rule of the Islamic regime.

Our battleground for freedom in Iran ranges from the homeland to this exile in Canada.

This is the battle of us all against the criminal Islamist regime and its military, economic, and political arms around the globe.

In the last four years, despite the spiteful confrontation of Simon Fraser University (SFU) management, I have tried to reveal the traces at SFU of a ballistic missiles expert of the regime and affiliates of the regime’s criminal leaders. From the onset, this revelation has been treated with acts of vengeance and cover-up of the facts by not only the SFU management but even the Canadian courts and government. But I know and you know that the truth will ultimately prevail.

Together, we will not let any of the security, military, or ideologic forces of the Islamic regime carry out the regime’s agenda in the guise of a student, visiting researcher, investor, or director of an Islamic centre in Canada and continue to enjoy the support of Canadian institutions.

With all our sufferings, let’s raise our voices and make advancements toward putting an end to a regime which only survives on lies and deception, keeping in mind that the truth will set us free.

نوشتار پارسی

بیش از صد روز است که لب بر خوراک بسته ام تا زبانم برای فاش گویی حقایق و ستیز با ستم باز بماند

مسعود مسجودی ام

کنشگر سیاسی، ریاضیدان و مدرس پیشین دانشگاه

مصمم ام که تا پایان بر سر آرمانهای آزادی خواهانه میلیون ها ایرانی زندانی در میهن یا، چون خود، تبعیدی بایستم و بجنگم؛

در جنگی که میدانش از خاک میهن تا همین تبعیدگاه کانادا گسترده است

این، نبرد همگی ماست با رژیم تبه کار اسلام پناه و بازوهای نظامی، اقتصادی، و سیاسی اش در سراسر جهان

در چهار سال گذشته، به رغم رویارویی کین ورزانه مدیریت دانشگاه سایمن فریزر، در افشاگری رد پای یک متخصص موشکی رژیم و نزدیکان رهبر جنایتکار حکومت ننگین اسلامی کوشیده ام. با این افشاگری از آغاز تا کنون با انتقام جویی و لاپوشانی حقایق حتی در دادگاه ها و دولت کانادا برخورد شده است. اما می دانم و می دانیم که حقیقت پشت ابر پنهان کردنی نیست .

ما با هم، نخواهیم گذارد که هیچ نیروی امنیتی، نظامی، یا عقیدتی با آسودگی در قالب دانشجو، محقق مهمان، سرمایه گذار یا مدیریت مرکز اسلامی در کانادا به مأموریت های ویژه خود برای رژیم بپردازد و از پشتیبانی نهادهای کانادایی برخوردار بماند

بیاییم با همه رنجوری فریاد بزنیم و گام از گام برداریم برای پایان دادن به حکومت متکی بر دروغ و فریب که حقیقت و راستی، پیش نیاز رسیدن به آزادی‌ست

Campaign against IRGC in Canada

Champaign’s First Statement, May 13 Rally in Vancouver & Contnuation of Hunger Strike

Letter to Justin Trudeau RE: The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the Campaign of #IRGCterrorists in Canada

کارزار برای قرارگیری سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی در لیست

تروریست‌ها در کانادا؛ همایش 13 مه در ونکوور و ادامه اعتصاب غذا

نسخه پارسی بیانیه را اینجا بخوانید
همزمان با بیانیه، نامه‌ای هم در پیوند با کارزار علیه سپاه به نخست وزیر ترودو فرستاده شد

See here for the PDF version of Statement 1.

May 11, 2023

No. 1

Statement

for the Campaign against the IRGC:

#IRGCterrorists in Canada

On this May 7, there was a social media announcement regarding a new wave of the campaign against the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), namely, “#IRGCterrorists in Canada” (the “Campaign”), demanding that the government of Canada designate the IRGC as a terrorist entity. This statement serves as a first formal introduction to the Campaign. The idea of the Campaign originated from an ongoing hunger strike in Vancouver in protesting the interference of the IRGC’s affiliates in Canada and the egregious misconduct of the courts supporting these agents and their individual and organizational enablers. The hunger strike, which started on Feb 21, will go on under the Campaign with a clear call on the Government of Canada: “End the interference of the Islamic Republic and put the IRGC, in its entirety, on the list of terrorist entities in Canada.”

It has been almost 5 years since a motion of the Parliament of Canada demanding the designation of the IRGC as a terrorist entity was passed with bipartisan support. And today, the government is yet to fulfill the Parliament’s demand. Meanwhile, the prominently rising illegal activities of the Islamic Republic’s regime particularly through members, families, and affiliates of the IRGC, in the form of espionage, buying influence in the public and private sectors, infiltrating the academia and research labs, raising funds for terrorist groups, money laundering, drug trafficking, etc., are mostly ignored by the Canadian government despite occasional verbal acknowledgements from the highest level of the political arena, including the Prime Minister who has personally called the IRGC a terrorist group, of course with zero legal effect, but adamantly resists placing the IRGC on the list of terrorist entities under the Criminal Code of Canada.

Indeed, it is not even a mixed message when the government declares that “the IRGC is a terrorist organization” but at the same time delays to an unspecified time in the future a decision to actually designate this terrorist organization as such- see, e.g., the joint announcement by the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister regarding Iran situation, Oct 7, 2022. Considering such matters as (a) the almost 5-year delay (and counting) to respond to the Parliament’s motion of June 2018 that called on the government to “immediately” designate the IRGC as a terrorist entity under the Criminal Code; (b) the government’s pushing the RCMP to not open a criminal investigation into the IRGC’s intentional missile attack on Flight PS752 killing 176 the vast majority of whom were Canadian citizens, permanent residents, or, students on their way to Canada; (c) frequent announcements of nominal and hollow sanctions “against” the Regime; and, on top of that, (d) the government’s continuing engagement with the lobbyists and “former” diplomatic agents of the regime some of whom have been openly violating the international sanctions against the Regime; the message that this oppressive mullahs regime hears from Canada is clear: This government is strongly signalling its reluctance to end the policy of appeasing the regime, no matter the level of domestic atrocities and human rights violations, and breach of international peace by the regime.

The lack of meaningful action against the IRGC, particularly in resisting a long-awaited designation as a terrorist entity has emboldened the Regime’s operatives in Canada and its oppressive forces in and outside Iran. In that regard, the government’s continuing inaction against the IRGC is complicity in many crimes of the Islamic Republic, domestic and abroad. Moreover, as long as the IRGC is not listed as a terrorist entity, the overall interference of the Islamic Republic in Canada may not be meaningfully countered and the embarrassing situation for the contaminated public bodies by this interference will only expand and higher risk to the national and international security will be caused.

Indeed, the impact of the interference of the IRGC agents seems to have created a situation where the interests of some highly influential Canadian politicians will be endangered once the IRGC is listed as a terrorist entity. However, this could change if, for the presumably compromised individuals, the loss of political, financial, and other interests due to their continued resistance to meaningfully sanctioning the IRGC outweighs the benefits of standing by and working with the IRGC. In that regard, exposing the illicit engagements between some influential public officeholders and the prominent interfering agents of the Regime seems to be a necessary step to take against the IRGC’s presence and interference in Canada.

The latter will have a pivotal role in this campaign.

Authored and endorsed by Masood Masjoody, Ph.D., on May 11, 2023.

PDF version of Statement 1:

2023may11-statement Download

برگردان بیانیه به پارسی

2023may11-statement-persian Download

Proscribing IRGC in the UK

International Campaign In Support of Vahid Beheshti’s Hunger Strike

کارزار جهانی برای قرارگیری سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی در سیاهه تروریستی انگلستان؛ پشتیبانی از اعتصاب غذا و تحصن وحید بهشتی در لندن

فراخوان برای کارزار نامه‌نگاری به دولت و نمایندگان دولت انگلستان

توضیح پارسی را از اینجا بخوانید

To support the cause of proscribing the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist entity by the UK government, we call on the Iranian communities around the globe and other supporters of #IranRevolution against the Mullahs regime to echo the voice of Vahid Beheshti by writing to the UK government and its representatives.

Feel free to use/adjust the following letter templates, kindly provided by Vahid’s wife Mattie Heaven, or use your own words.

If you are using these templates, please change the recipient’s name/position according to your country of residence, adjust the date of the letter, and add the signatory/ies.

For your convenience, each template is provided in MS Word (with a download link) and plain text format.

Template 1: Suggested Form of Letter to the British High Commissioner (to Canada)

Template 2: Suggested Form of Letter to Foreign Secretary of the UK

Suggested form of the letter to the British High Commissioner (to Canada)

MS Word

British_High_Commissioner-Canada Download

Plain text:

Susannah Goshko CMG

British High Commission, Ottowa

Dear High Commissioner, 23.04.2023

Women, Life, Freedom, and the Iranian revolution led by the brave and remarkable women of Iran and fully supported by an entire nation has galvanised the international community.

The world has witnessed the brutality of the regime’s crackdown on protestors which has led to over 700 unarmed civilian deaths and the arrest of over 30,000 protestors. Many in custody face torture, sexual assault, and rape. Sham trials have led to the execution of at least four young protestors.

The Iranian diaspora has stood in solidarity with the Iranian people and indeed, many Canadians have stood with the freedom movement in Iran.

As a Canadian citizen, I have now been educated and enlightened about the brutality and inhumanity as well as the terrorist activities of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). The IRGC and its para-military forces are responsible for the deaths of unarmed civilians as well as countless terrorist activities in the Near East and beyond. One notable activity is the supply of suicide drones and ballistic missiles to Moscow which has resulted in the deaths of so many Ukrainian civilians.

Canada is a commonwealth family and my head of state is his majesty, King Charles III. I am very concerned that the UK government has to date ignored calls to proscribe the IRGC.

The House of Commons voted unanimously to proscribe the IRGC. Over 120 MPs have now written to the UK Prime Minister asking for proscription.

Mr. Vahid Beheshti, a British citizen, is nearing a 60-day hunger strike outside the Foreign Office in London, such is the determination and passion of UK citizens to proscribe the IRGC.

MI5 has warned of over 20 plots against Iranian dissidents in the UK. A media company was forced to relocate from London due to direct threats. Many British citizens are now living in fear as they have been directly or indirectly threatened by members of the IRGC.

To protect the shores of Great Britain, ensure the safety of the UK and commonwealth, as well as to protect free speech, journalism, and human rights, I ask for the UK government to proscribe the IRGC.

It is now time that Great Britain stands on the right side of history and leads the international community once again on the right path.

Kind regards,

Suggested form of the letter to the Foreign Secretary of the UK

fcdo.correspondence@fcdo.gov.uk

MS Word

open_letter_fcdo_RE_Vahid_Beheshti Download

Plain text:

Rt Hon James Cleverly

King Charles Street

London SW1A 2AH

23 April 2023

Open letter to the Foreign Secretary

Mr. Vahid Beheshti, a British citizen, is on a hunger strike outside the Foreign Office asking for the U.K government to proscribe the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) as a terror organisation under the terrorism act 2000.

The 13^th of April marked the 50^th day of his hunger strike. Mr. Beheshti, like many of his friends, family, and indeed the Iranian diaspora and British citizens are calling for the IRGC to be proscribed as they are directly responsible for the spread of terror and fear, as well as the unlawful murder of many thousands of civilians in Iran and beyond.

The activities of the IRGC have also reached the shores of Britain. MI5 warned of at least 20 plots against Iranian activists since 2022 and more recently, the voice of free speech and journalism was silenced when Iran International media group was forced to relocate from London as a direct threat to life from the IRGC. Many within the Iranian diaspora live with fear and anxiety as a consequence of threats by the IRGC. This is a breach of their human rights as they should be able to air their feelings against the theocratic dictatorship in Tehran without fear.

There exists overwhelming documented evidence justifying the proscription of the IRGC as a terrorist organisation and sending the Islamic Republic a firm notice of intention that the barbaric actions and breaches of international law and human rights will no longer be tolerated. This move will also safeguard British shores as the IRGC is intimidating, threatening, and endangering the lives of many British citizens with impunity.

The actions of the IRGC in Iran and beyond are inhumane, criminal, and unlawful. The spread of terrorism must be stopped and the UK must once again lead the international world by holding to account the criminality of the IRGC. Individual sanctions have had little to no effect. A proscription will be a logistical and psychological setback for the IRGC and Tehran.

The United States has already proscribed the IRGC as a terrorist entity. Despite this, an attempt was made on the life of British-American author, Salman Rushdie.

Without the proscription curtailing the activities of the IRGC, the result may have been very different.

The Iranian diaspora and many British citizens are looking to the UK government to stand on the right side of history and proscribe the IRGC and protect their human rights, safety, and well-being in the U.K.

It is only right and appropriate for the Foreign Secretary as well as the Prime Minister to meet with Mr. Beheshti, a man who is risking his well-being for the advocation of Human Rights and for the protection of free speech, free journalism and the protection of Great Britain.

کارزار جهانی برای تعیین سپاه پاسداران به عنوان سازمانی تروریستی در کشورهای جهان آزاد، به ویژه در انگلستان، اتحادیه اروپا، و کانادا به روزهای سرنوشت سازی رسیده است. در لندن، اعتصاب غذا و تحصن وحید بهشتی روبه‌روی وزارت امور خارجی از روز بیست و سوم فوریه سال 2023 در جریان بوده است و با افزایش بازتاب رسانه‌ای و پشتیبانی بسیاری از اعضای پارلمان انگلستان، دولت انگلستان و شخص نخست وزیر را در تنگنای بی‌سابقه‌ای گذاشته است. در این میان، راهپیمایی روز بیست و نهم آوریل در لندن و کارزار نامه‌نگاری به وزیر امور خارجی در دولت و نمایندگان دولت انگلستان ، می‌تواند به مقاومت ریشی سونک در برابر لیست کردن سپاه پایان دهد و نیز کارزار مشابه در دیگر نقاط جهان را به پیروزی نزدیک‌تر کند. الگوهای پیشنهادی برای نامه‌نگاری‌ها از سوی همسر وحید، بانو متی هون فراهم آمده اند و در دو فرم در دسترس قرار می‌گیرند. بدیهی‌ست هم‌میهنان پشتیبان، می‌توانند متن نامه را به دلخواه خود تغییر دهند یا نامه‌های دیگری به سبک دلخواه خود بنویسند و به دریافت‌کنندگان بفرستند. الگوهای پیسنهادی را در اینجا خواهید یافت

Tweets by Vahid_Beheshti

Tweets by MattieHeaven