Starting at 9 AM on Tuesday, Feb 21, 2023, I will go on an unlimited dry hunger strike to protest heinous injustice made by the BC Supreme Court and Court of Appeal during the last 3 years.
The location for this protest is the entrance to Vancouver Law Courts located on Hornby St at Nelson St. This protest will end only when the BC Court of Appeal respects the rule of law by accepting to hear and properly address my applications made to the court on Dec 22, 2022, where, among other things, I raised once more the conveniently ignored issue of the biased conduct of Judge Fitzpatrick by the BC Court of Appeal.
This hunger strike is also to raise awareness about the shockingly biased conduct of certain judges including, but not limited to, Shelley Colleen Fitzpatrick, Len Marchand, Gregory James Fitch, and Barbara Fisher, who, in the matter of Masjoody v. Simon Fraser University, turned BC courts of law into realms of tyranny where my fundamental legal rights were ignored and instead Islamist terrorists and their enablers were unjustly protected and covered up for.
The Chief Justice of British Columbia has been informed of this protest as of Feb 16, 2023, after on the same day the Division of the BC Court of Appeal declined to consider my applications of Dec 22, 2022, whereas even the sole matter of Fitzpatrick’s bias should have led to the success of the appeal, as mandated by the binding rulings of the Supreme Court of Canada.
I have requested an in-person meeting with Justice Bauman before Tuesday, Feb 21, to allow for finding a fair and reasonable remedy for the situation created by grave injustice and judicial activism favouring the terrorists over the rule of law.
My latest letter to Chief Justice Bauman is available below.
Another step toward transparency and for the rule of law to prevail
This post contains a letter of Feb 16, 2023, to the President of the University of Tours (“UT”), Dr. Arnaud Giacometti, concerning a former student of UT, Amélie Trotignon, who was coerced, expansively used, then silenced and effectively taken hostage by the SFU administration who used her in their widespread conspiracy in response to the disclosure of SFU engagement with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Simon Fraser University engaged with several agents of the regime of the Islamic Republic who have been affiliated with the ballistic missile program of the regime, the terrorist entity Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the regime’s leader and president.
It is likely that if SFU’s conspiracy and subsequent cover-up are not defeated, SFU and other Canadian universities will continue to use other international or exchange students in and around their dealings with Islamist terrorists, particularly from the Islamic Republic.
With these considerations, the University of Tours can reasonably intervene in the ongoing appeal proceedings and also in any subsequent court hearings as a third party.
Feb 16, 2023
Dear Dr. Arnaud Giacometti
The President of the University of Tours
RE: Court proceedings in Canada involving the Islamic Republic of Iran and a former student of the University of Tours
I am writing to you about UT’s interest in legal actions
Masood Masjoody v. Simon Fraser University, Amélie Trotignon
in the courts of British Columbia in Canada, which involve a former student of UT as a defendant.
There have been aspects of these actions that put UT in the position of a party of interest so that UT may want to intervene in these matters both to seek damages and to protect its interest from future harm by Simon Fraser University or other enablers of the Islamist terrorists whose number is on the rise within Canadian academia.
I started legal action to seek damages for retaliatory defamation and conspiracy that were planned by the SFU administration and carried out by the defendants in response to the disclosure in 2019 of SFU’s expansive engagement with the regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran (designated as a state supporter of terrorism in Canada), particularly with agents of that regime who are active in its programs to develop ballistic missiles and military drones and are tied with top violators of human rights in and outside Iran, including the regime’s leader and president.
Of particular interest to UT is that SFU coerced, expansively used, then silenced and effectively took hostage a then-student of the UT, i.e., Amélie Trotignon, who SFU used in its revengeful conspiratorial campaign against me.
Since I started my legal action in Canadian courts in 2020, SFU tried to corrupt the courts and buy influence therein to the end of hiding their criminalities from the public eye. As a result, there has been no trial so far. However, there are appeal proceedings going on that aim to rectify previous courts’ errors and misconduct- particularly the bias of judges who stopped the proceedings from moving forward- and are expected to bring the wrongdoers to justice in the trial court in the coming months.
It is likely that if SFU’s conspiracy and subsequent cover-up are not strongly confronted, exposed, and defeated, SFU and other Canadian universities will continue to engage or use other international or exchange students, from France (as in Amélie Trotignion’s case) or elsewhere, in and around their dealings with Islamist terrorists, particularly from the Islamic Republic.
With these considerations, the University of Tours can reasonably intervene in the ongoing appeal proceedings and also in any subsequent court hearings as a third party. If that is the case, I would also support a UT’s claim against SFU for aspects of the defendant’s conspiracy and cover-up that are connected to or have caused an infringement of a legal right of the University of Tours.
Apart from Amélie Trotignon, the following individuals were among the initiating or continuing revengeful conspirators and enablers of the Islamic Republic’s agents from within the SFU administration: Marni Julie Mishna (Amélie Trotignon’s supervisor), Mary Catherine Kropinslki (a then department chair), Paul Kench (a faculty dean), Robert B. Kennedy (SFU’s counsel), and former and current presidents of SFU, Andrew Petter and Joy Johnson.
Given the strength of the appeal and growing public concern and vigilance about foreign interference in Canadian institutions (including courts) by the Islamic Republic, it is expected that the rule of law will prevail and the appeal will succeed so that in the coming months the case will be before the trial court. In both sets of proceedings, I welcome the intervention of the University of Tours.
I am sharing links to some of the related documents and letters to the courts.
The situation of hostages taken by terrorist Mullahs in Iran and their Canadian enablers
This post contains an open letter of Oct 11, 2022, to President Emmanuel Macron suggesting a viable solution to the situation of two French hostages, Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris, taken by the Islamic Republic in Iran and informing the President about another hostage, Amélie Trotignon, taken by the Canadian enablers of the Islamic Republic.
The latter is related to the engagement of Simon Fraser University in Canada with several agents of the regime of the Islamic Republic who have been affiliated with the ballistic missile program of the regime, the terrorist entity Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the regime’s leader and president.
There is a very viable and effective solution [to the situation of Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris]that will lead to their immediate liberation: France and European allies simply need to cease the policy of appeasing the regime and, instead, send a unified message of strength by recalling their ambassadors to Iran and quashing diplomatic ties with the Islamic Republic.
Letter to Emmanuel Macron, Oct 11, 2022
Oct 11, 2022
Dear Mr. President of the Republic of France,
Subject: The situation of the two French hostages in Iran and another one residing in France
This open letter is being written to provide some hopefully resolving insight into the situation of the two French hostages in Iran and also to inform you about the situation of a French hostage in France taken by the Canadian allies of the Islamic Republic.
1-French Hostages in Iran:
Last week, the falling regime of the Islamic Republic broadcast “confessions” of two French hostages, Mme Cécile Kohler and M. Jacques Paris, trying to link them to the ongoing protests by millions of brave Iranian revolutionists. You know too well that the Islamic regime is using the hostages to generally elevate its demands from the West and, at this particular point in time, keep the EU away from providing any meaningful support to the freedom fighters in Iran.
The bitter truth is that what emboldened the regime to torture foreign hostages to this unprecedented level and put their forced confessions on state TV consists in France’s obsession with empowering this regime through reviving JCPOA and other nonsensical manoeuvres, such as pressuring Belgium to release a convicted diplomat-terrorist of the Islamic Republic and, with all due respect, your recent meeting with the regime’s president, who is rightfully nicknamed Ayatollah Murderer (for his prominent role on the Death Committee ruling the killing of thousands of political prisoners in the Summer of 1988).
On the other hand, however complicated the situation may seem, there is a very viable and effective solution that, as history shows, will lead to the immediate liberation of the hostages: France and European allies simply need to cease the policy of appeasing the regime and, instead, send a unified message of strength by recalling their ambassadors to Iran and quashing diplomatic ties with the Islamic Republic. The only reason why this hostage-taking has not culminated is that the EU has consistently been reacting the wrong way, however, due to the regime’s extreme shakiness, you will be in full control of the hostages’ fate should you decide to lead the EU in the right direction.
2-A French Hostage in France, taken by the Islamic Republic’s allies in Canadian Academia
Hostage-taking has been a core characteristic of the regime of the Islamic Republic since its conception in 1979. Besides the regime’s official institutions, occasionally, the regime’s proxy terrorist groups have also carried out this policy for it. Hereby, I would like to inform you about a specific matter that entails a new type of hostage-taking not by the regime or its proxies in the Middle East but by the regime’s allies in North American academia, also known as the academic left. I believe your government pushing for transparency at this time will essentially prevent similar situations in the future.
The specific case that I am bringing to your attention includes some French citizens, one of whom is indeed on the hostage-taking side.
The matter dates back to April 2019, when I discovered and disclosed the support for the ballistic missile program of the Islamic Republic by a Canadian institution called Simon Fraser University (SFU). I revealed that SFU hosted and extensively supported some individuals who are affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the leader of the Islamic Republic, and Ayatollah Murderer. One of the supported agents, called Shahrokh Jam, has been a prominent military expert working in the field of ballistic missiles for Iran Space research Center and the Defence Industries Organization.
Connection to France
To hide its internationally criminal engagement, SFU launched a retaliatory campaign in 2019 against me which included in part coercing, intimidating, and subsequently silencing a French citizen and then-PhD candidate at SFU, named Amélie Trotignon. Trotignon, who inadvertently has damaging information about SFU’s campaign, has been intimidated and forced to remain silent even now that she is in her home country of France.
Among the people who abused Amélie Trotignon are former and current presidents of SFU, a faculty dean at SFU, and SFU’s lawyer, respectively named Andrew Petter, Joy Johnson, Paul Kench, and Robert B. Kennedy. With the help and direct involvement of its lawyer, SFU also successfully attempted to corrupt the Canadian justice system to cover up SFU’s criminalities in support of the terrorist regime of the Islamic Republic.
Some detailed information about the matter has been made available on the website:
and is being sent to your office alongside further sensitive information that is not available to the public yet.
As an exiled Iranian libertarian, I have no doubt that the long-term interests of my country and your country rely on upholding such fundamental values as human rights and dignity, the rule of law, freedom, and transparency. The representatives of the long-standing French democracy are expected to avoid the trampling of these values in their interaction with the regime of the Islamic Republic and its international enablers.
On the matter of criminalities introduced herein, I will continue to provide any further relevant information and evidence and look forward to seeing proper measures taken against the said hostage-takers and enablers of the Islamic Republic.
Military and Political Agents of the Islamic Republic Regime Supported by the SFU Administration: Legal Documents
TRUTH v. SFU; Amélie Trotignon.
Following the disclosure (in April 2019) of SFU’s political, scientific, and technical support for the terrorist regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran (including its ballistic missile program), SFU commenced a conspiracy campaign against the Plaintiff, by the way of sexual harassment and defamation, which campaign extended well into Fall 2019. SFU did not respond to the relevant Freedom of Information requests and eventually, the Plaintiff commenced legal action against SFU in May 2020 (amended in June 2021). SFU has continued to cover up for their serious wrongdoings and attempted to corrupt other institutions, including the justice system. This post contains some excerpts from pleadings containing information about the agents of the Mullahs’ regime, and some evidentiary documents.
See here for a general description in Persian of these agents and their ties with the oppressive institutions in Iran.
Iran Space Research Center (ISRC) is in charge of carrying out the day-to-day work approved by the Supreme Space Council. It serves as Iran Space Agency’s (ISA) primary partner for research and development activities and its research centers account for the majority of ISA’s labor, property holdings, and technical workforce. ISRC, along with ISA, has worked with the UN-designated liquid propellant ballistic missile organization Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group (SHIG) on several projects.
The US Department of State
The Description provided in the Plaintiff’s Notice of Claim filed with the Supreme Court of British Columbia, June 2021
“The report to the SFU President concerning agents of the regime in Iran at SFU“
“On April 11, 2019, more than 1.5 years into my friendship with Trotignon, I reported to the SFU President the presence at SFU of certain agents of the regime in Iran- a regime which has been designated by Canada as a state supporter of terrorism since 2012- and described their activities, and the supports they received from within the SFU administration. I described the situation as a national security threat. As for one of the agents I reported, called Seyyed Aliasghar Hosseini, I described the extraordinary support he received from SFU and the Mathematics Department. I reported that that person had publicized through his SFU webpage alarming contents disclosing the ties he and his father, called Seyyed Ebrahim Hosseini, have with a terrorist organization called the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (“IRGC”) and the office of Iran’s dictator, Seyyed Ali Khamenei (“Khamenei”).
“Another individual who I named in my report was a visiting scholar from Iran called Shahrokh Jam(“Jam”), who is closely involved in the regime in Iran’s ballistic missile program. Jam works for Iranian Space Research Center (“ISRC”), the brutal police force of Iran, and has also been a faculty dean and the president of the Shiraz University of Technology in Iran. I reported to SFU that In his academic leadership roles, Jam persecuted and suspended many student political activists. Some of Jam’s roles and activities within the regime in Iran are as follows:
Participated in the 444-day Occupation of the US Embassy in Tehran and holding 52 American diplomats hostage, following the seizure of the US Embassy on Nov 4, 1979
Participated in the Cultural Revolution in 1980, leading to the shutting down of all universities and colleges in Iran for a period of at least two years and firing, imprisonment, torture, and killings of thousands of Iranian university students, professors, and staff members, because of their cultural, political, and ideological differences with the Islamic revolutionary ruling-forces of the country
Joined the Defence Industries Organization, after the Cultural Revolution, and has continued to work with that entity
Served as the president of the Shiraz University of Technology (two terms), which is the major research partner of the Defence Industries Organization
Researcher at Iranian Space Research Center, whereby involved in the ballistic missile program of the regime in Iran, feeding the Quds Force of the IRGC (designated as a terrorist organization by Canada) and several other Islamist terrorist groups throughout the Middle East, including Hamas and Hezbollah
Collaborating with the Disciplinary Force of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“DFIRI”), which is the police force of the regime, and being an editorial board member of the Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Policing (JICTP) owned and operated by DFIRI
“Seyyed Ebrahim Hosseini is a major supporter of Seyed Ebrahim Raisi (“Raisi”) in the province of Fars in Iran. In 2021, he was nominated by Raisi’s campaign, called the Alliance of Islamic Revolutionary Forces, to run for the Islamic City Council of Shiraz, the capital of Fars. As of August 2021, he will be a member of the Islamic City Council of Shiraz.
“Raisi is the incoming Islamic President of the regime in Iran. In 1988, Raisi was one of the four judges appointed by Ruhollah Khomeini, the then-dictator of Iran, to be on a special judiciary board, known as the “Death Committee”, directly responsible for the mass executions of thousands of political prisoners in Iran in the summer of 1988 (1988 Massacre)- the victims of 1988 Massacre were buried in unmarked mass graves whose locations have never been disclosed to the victims’ loved ones. In 2013, the Canadian Parliament passed a motion to recognize the 1988 massacre of thousands of political prisoners in Iran as a crime against humanity, and to recognize September 1 as a national day of solidarity with political prisoners in Iran. Raisi is complicit, as a member of the Supreme National Security Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in the deliberate shooting down of Flight PS752 on Jan 8, 2020, and killings of all 167 passengers (55 Canadian citizens, 30 permanent residents, and 53 others on their way to Canada) and 9 crew. Raisi is also responsible, as the Head of the Judiciary of the Islamic Republic of Iran, for blocking the investigation into the intentional shooting down of Flight PS752, and for the repeated and systematic persecution of the families of the victims of Flight PS752. The Superior Court of Ontario has ruled that the shooting down of Flight PS752 was an intentional act of terrorism by the Islamic Republic of Iran.
“As included in my report to the President of SFU, Seyyed Ebrahim Hosseini also ran for parliamentary elections in Iran and was supported by a coalition led by high profile elements of the office of Khamenei (the Supreme Leader’s Office) and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (“IRGC”). SFU let his official campaign website be loaded on, and run from, SFU.ca- the SFU’s official domain on the Internet- by Seyyed Aliasghar Hosseini.
“I gathered evidence about the aforementioned agents of the regime in Iran at SFU through different sources and individuals, including from the SFU webpage and official regime’s webpages in Iran, and, having known about SFU’s inaction, delivered them to the relevant institutions in Canada, including Royal Canadian Mounted Police (“RCMP”) and Canadian Security Intelligence Service (“CSIS”).
“The SFU administration did not take any action to rectify the situation I reported to them in April 2019. SFU did not report the matter to other authorities, such as RCMP or CSIS, or even to the SFU Campus Security. Despite my repeated attempts to follow up on the matter, SFU never reached out to me about my report. Instead, in response to my report, the SFU administration started […] defamation and conspiracy campaigns [against me]. SFU deliberately mischaracterized, lied, and covered up all these misconducts.
The US Department of State designated Iran Space Research Center (ISRC) under Executive Order (E.O.) 13382, which targets proliferators of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and WMD delivery systems and their supporters.
Ruling on the appeal while IGNORING a major chunk of the appeal
The Court’s Obscure Approach
It is astonishing that this pseudo-legal artifice has been crafted in the 21st century by the high Court of British Columbia with all its constitutional (including Charter) obligations, not by omnipotent medieval rulers or the modern era judicial puppets of “remarkable” and “larger than life” “leaders” such as Stalin and, of course, Castro.
Letter to Chief Justice
However, I note that two of the three judges in the Division are appointees of PM Justin Trudeau, whose Justice Ministry has unapologetically stood in the way of, and harassed, the justice-seeking families of victims of the deliberate shootdown of Flight PS752 by the Islamic Republic, and has sided in Canadian courts with the criminal leaders of the Islamic Republic and the chiefs of the terrorist entity, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Letter to Chief Justice
Justin Trudeau’s statement on the death of Cuba’s dictator, Fidel Castro:
“Fidel Castro was A LARGER THAN LIFE LEADER … a legendary revolutionary and orator…”
“My father was very proud to call him a friend…”
“On behalf of all Canadians … we join the people of Cuba today in mourning the loss of this REMARKABLE LEADER.”
Justin Trudeau, November 26, 2016
The devastating implications on victims of a conspiracy
The Extensive Corrupt Dealings of the SFU lawyers with the Courts and the Courts’ Bias in their Support
Once one of our public institutions is dominated by Islamism, bringing it back to its normal functionality becomes out of reach through conventional methods of reforms from within. External reforms will also prove inefficient if an institution is corrupted by Islamism that is not governed by any higher institution- the justice system, which is the ultimate protector of democracy, is a perfect example. It is not a mystery that the justice system, likewise other pillars of democracy, has been long targeted and infiltrated by Islamist forces.
The duty to protect democracy and democratic values requires that desislamisation of the courts not be waited until after the courts are fully dominated by the vicious forces of Islamism.